Lab 1
Run Acme’s July BvA meeting
Scenario
July is closed. Acme’s BvA shows: Revenue $184,200 vs. $175,000 budget (+$9,200); Wages $93,100 vs. $87,000 (+$6,100); Supplies $13,300 vs. $10,400 (+$2,900); everything else within $500 of plan. Materiality policy: comment on anything over $1,000 or 10%.
Steps
- 1
Open the BvA command center for July, monthly lens, sorted by absolute dollar variance.
Expected: Revenue, Wages, and Supplies float to the top; the rest of the grid is quiet.
- 2
Drill into the Revenue line to find the driver.
Expected: The Riverside Property Group invoices explain the overage - the contract started early.
- 3
Write commentary on all three material lines, tagging each as timing or permanent, with an action and owner.
Expected: Three comments saved: revenue permanent/favorable, wages timing (ends September), supplies timing (August budget spent in July).
- 4
Switch to the full-year lens.
Expected: Projected landing shows revenue ~$18k favorable and costs roughly on plan - the annual target is intact.
- 5
Open the exec KPI page for July and confirm the three comments surface with the KPIs.
Expected: The page shows headline numbers vs. budget with your commentary attached.
- 6
Decide explicitly: does anything here trigger a reforecast?
Expected: Not yet - one favorable month is a note, not a new plan. Log the decision in the revenue comment.
Checkpoints - you got it right if…
- Exactly three variance comments written (the materiality policy held)
- Each comment classifies timing vs. permanent and names an owner
- Full-year lens reviewed and the annual landing stated in one sentence
- A deliberate reforecast/no-reforecast decision was recorded