Spend Your Attention Where the Risk Is
A stream of governed actions is a firehose; you need the short list. SentriAI ranks the riskiest recent decisions with explainable factors and gives you tamper-evident records to investigate what an agent actually did.
What you get
As a security analyst your scarcest resource is attention, and most of what you review turns out not to matter. SentriAI hands you a ranked queue of the decisions that do - each with the concrete factors behind its risk - and a complete, verifiable record to investigate the ones that warrant a closer look.
- A ranked queue of the riskiest recent decisions, not a raw log
- Explainable factors on each decision - no opaque scores
- Tamper-evident records to reconstruct exactly what an actor did
- Containment that preserves the signal a hard block would destroy
Mapped to what matters to you
| Your priority | How SentriAI helps |
|---|---|
| Cut through the noise | Decision intelligence ranks decisions by risk, riskiest first |
| Understand the risk | Each decision carries explainable trust factors |
| Investigate fast | An evidence packet per case with hashed events and a timeline |
| Preserve the signal | Contain a borderline actor in place instead of hard-blocking |
| Close the loop | Confirm outcomes so the same pattern escalates next time |
Where it fits your work
How a security analyst uses SentriAI
- Work a short queue of the riskiest decisions instead of scanning logs
- Read the trust factors to triage a decision without guesswork
- Open an evidence packet to reconstruct an incident from one source
- Confirm the outcome so the compounding loop sharpens future decisions
Why SentriAI
Frequently asked questions
How does SentriAI help a security analyst?
It ranks the riskiest recent governed decisions with explainable factors, so your attention goes to what matters, and it gives you a tamper-evident evidence packet per case to investigate exactly what an actor did.
Are the risk scores explainable?
Yes. Every decision carries its trust factors - actor type, sensitive data, policy violations, live compromise signals - each marked as raising or lowering trust, so you triage from concrete reasons rather than an opaque number.
How do I investigate what an agent did?
Open the case as an evidence packet: the hashed events, the decisions, and the timeline in one verifiable place, reconstructed from the tamper-evident ledger rather than pieced together from scattered logs.
How do I stop a pattern from recurring?
Confirm the real-world outcome so the compounding loop applies it; the next decision for that actor and pattern then escalates automatically.
Stay in the loop
One practical finance briefing a week - new guides, checklists, and benchmarks.
Work the short list, not the firehose
Rank and investigate the riskiest decisions. Start free, no card required.
Talk to us