Prove SOC 2 CC6 With the Decisions Themselves
CC6 asks whether logical access is restricted and authorized. The strongest evidence is not a screenshot of a settings page - it is the record of access decisions actually being made and enforced on live actions.
Why this is hard
CC6 covers logical and physical access controls, and the logical part trips teams up because it is about what happens at runtime, not what a config page shows. Auditors increasingly want proof that access was authorized and restricted on real actions, including the ones that were denied. Reconstructing that from scattered application logs after the fact is painful and often incomplete.
- Config screenshots prove a setting existed, not that access was enforced
- Denied and stepped-up access is the best evidence, and it is usually discarded
- Access by AI agents and service accounts is a growing blind spot
- Assembling the evidence at audit time means it may not exist for the whole period
The approach, step by step
From CC6 requirement to enforced evidence
- 1
Map access to actions
Identify the consequential actions in scope - reads and writes on sensitive data, privileged operations, cross-tenant access - and treat each as an access decision rather than a static permission.
- 2
Enforce authorization per action
Put a Policy Decision Point in the path so each action is checked for scope containment, tenant isolation, and sensitivity, returning allow, step-up, or deny with a reason.
- 3
Capture denials and step-ups
Record the actions that were held or denied, not just the ones allowed. A blocked over-scoped action is direct proof the CC6 control is enforced.
- 4
Hash the decisions
Write each decision to a tamper-evident ledger with the actor, target, verdict, and policy version, so the record is reproducible and verifiable.
- 5
Map to CC6 and export
Tie each authorization decision to the CC6 criterion via control-impact hints and export the period as an evidence bundle for the auditor.
How SentriAI does the work
SentriAI decides and records access at the action, so CC6 evidence is a byproduct of operating. Authorization decisions, step-ups, and denials - including cross-tenant blocks - are hashed into the trust ledger and mapped to CC6 automatically, and the evidence room bundles the period.
What you get out of the box
- Per-action authorization decisions with plain-English reasons
- Cross-tenant and out-of-scope denials recorded as enforcement proof
- Hashed, reproducible ledger entries mapped to CC6
- An exportable evidence bundle for the audit period
Avoid the common pitfall
Frequently asked questions
What does SOC 2 CC6 require?
CC6 covers logical and physical access controls - restricting access to systems and data to authorized users and actions. The logical-access part is best evidenced by the authorization decisions your system actually makes on live actions, including the ones it denies.
What is the best evidence for CC6?
Recorded authorization decisions on real actions: allows, step-ups, and especially denials of out-of-scope or cross-tenant access. A blocked action, hashed and mapped to CC6, proves the control is enforced in practice rather than merely configured.
How do I evidence CC6 for AI agents?
Treat the agent as an actor and govern its actions with a Policy Decision Point, so each agent access is authorized, scoped, and recorded. That brings agents into CC6 scope with the same evidence as any other actor.
Can this evidence be reused for other frameworks?
Yes. The access decisions are framework-neutral, so the same evidence that proves CC6 also maps to ISO 27001 access control and PCI DSS need-to-know requirements.
Stay in the loop
One practical finance briefing a week - new guides, checklists, and benchmarks.
Prove CC6 with real decisions
Record authorization decisions as tamper-evident CC6 evidence. Start free, no card required.
Talk to us