Fintra vs EasyAudit
EasyAudit uses AI to speed up audit work for accountants and auditors. Fintra takes a different route: it emits governed, control-mapped, hash-chained evidence at the source, so an audit draws from a live tamper-evident ledger instead of being reconstructed after the fact.
TL;DR verdict
EasyAudit is an AI audit-automation tool. It helps accountants and auditors move faster through the work of pulling documents, testing samples, and drafting workpapers on top of whatever systems a client already runs. Fintra sits one layer earlier: it owns the ledger and the HR system, and every governed action emits control-mapped evidence into a hash-chained, tamper-evident store. So the audit is not reconstructed from screenshots and exports. It reads from evidence the real system produced as the work happened.
What EasyAudit does well
- Meets auditors and accountants where they work, across whatever systems a client already runs.
- Uses AI to compress the slow parts of an audit: gathering documents, testing samples, and drafting workpapers.
- A practical fit for firms that audit many clients and cannot dictate the underlying stack.
- Focused on the audit workflow itself, which is exactly where a lot of manual hours go.
Where Fintra differs
An audit tool works with the evidence it can find. Fintra changes what evidence exists in the first place. Because Fintra owns the general ledger and the HR system, a governed action can emit its own evidence at the moment it happens: what was decided, by whom, against which control, with a hash that chains to the record before it. The audit then reads that, rather than trying to reassemble it later.
- Evidence emitted at the source by the system that owns the money and the people data, not collected after the fact.
- A hash-chained, tamper-evident evidence store, so a record cannot be quietly altered later.
- SentriProof GRC with a real engine of 76 frameworks and 275 controls, and rule-based, explainable scoring.
- Control mapping built in, so an action ties to the control it satisfies rather than to a folder of screenshots.
- An auditor portal that reads live, control-mapped evidence, plus vendor reviews and a policy and evidence room.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | EasyAudit | Fintra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI audit-automation for accountants and auditors | Governed finance and HR OS that emits audit evidence |
| Where it sits | On top of a client existing systems | Owns the ledger and HR system |
| Evidence model | Gathered and tested after the fact | Emitted at the source as the action happens |
| Evidence integrity | Depends on the source documents | Hash-chained and tamper-evident |
| Control mapping | Applied during the audit | Built in, action ties to the control it satisfies |
| GRC and auditor access | Workflow tooling | SentriProof GRC plus a live auditor portal |
| Best fit | Firms auditing many clients | Companies wanting evidence generated by their own system |
Who should choose which
- Choose EasyAudit if you are an auditor or firm working across client systems you do not control and want AI to speed the audit.
- Choose Fintra if you want your own system of record to emit governed, hash-chained evidence at the source.
- Choose Fintra if you would rather an audit read from live, control-mapped evidence than from reconstructed screenshots.
- Use both in principle: run your books and evidence in Fintra, and let an audit tool or auditor work against that clean, tamper-evident trail.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fintra an EasyAudit alternative?
Not directly, because they operate at different layers. EasyAudit automates the audit workflow on top of whatever systems a client runs. Fintra is one of those systems, and it emits governed, hash-chained evidence at the source so an audit has less to reconstruct. If you audit clients on systems you do not control, EasyAudit is built for that. If you want your own system to produce the evidence, Fintra is the fit.
What does emitting evidence at the source actually mean?
It means the evidence is a byproduct of the real action, not something assembled afterward. When a governed action runs in Fintra, it records what was decided, by whom, against which control, and chains that record with a hash so it cannot be quietly altered. An auditor reads that live trail through the auditor portal instead of chasing screenshots and exports.
Does Fintra issue an audit opinion or a certification?
No, and we are careful about this. Fintra is not an audit firm. Its SentriProof scoring is a rule-based, explainable readiness position across 76 frameworks and 275 controls, not a certificate or an authorization to operate. It makes an audit easier to pass by producing clean evidence; it does not replace the auditor or the opinion.
How honest is Fintra about what is live today?
Plainly honest. The GRC engine, the hash-chained evidence store, control mapping, and the auditor portal are real. Some governance surfaces run on seeded data today, money-movement enforcement is staged, and Fintra does not move real money yet. We would rather state that than imply a maturity we have not reached.
Stay in the loop
One practical finance briefing a week - new guides, checklists, and benchmarks.
Make audit evidence a byproduct, not a project
Own the ledger, emit governed hash-chained evidence at the source, and let auditors read it live. Talk to us - we will map it to your stack.
Talk to us