SentriAI vs Hyperproof
Hyperproof runs compliance operations across many frameworks. SentriAI governs the live action. Here is the honest comparison.
TL;DR verdict
Hyperproof is a compliance operations and GRC platform for managing controls, evidence, and multiple frameworks at scale. SentriAI is an AI Action Governance platform: it decides, per action and at runtime, whether an actor should be allowed to do a thing to a resource - and records the verdict as tamper-evident evidence. These solve different problems, and for most teams they are complementary rather than either-or.
What Hyperproof does well
- Strong control and evidence management across many frameworks
- Workflow for compliance teams operating at scale
- Reuse of controls and evidence across overlapping frameworks
- Reporting and program management for GRC functions
Where SentriAI differs
Hyperproof manages the compliance program - controls, evidence, and frameworks - as an operation. SentriAI operates at the action, deciding and recording each one. Hyperproof organizes and tracks evidence; SentriAI generates a specific kind of it: runtime proof that a control operated on a real action, mapped and hashed. They meet where the evidence lands.
What SentriAI adds that this category does not
- A per-action Policy Decision Point that returns allow, step-up, review, contain, or deny
- An Action Trust Score (0–100) with the explainable factors behind it
- A hash-chained, reproducible trust ledger for every decision
- Governed actions that map themselves to SOC 2 CC6/CC7 and other controls
Side-by-side
| Dimension | SentriAI | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Decide + govern live actions | Manage compliance operations |
| Unit of control | The individual action | The control and program |
| Runtime enforcement | Yes | No - program and evidence management |
| AI agent governance | Core | Policy-level |
| Evidence model | Generates runtime action evidence | Organizes and tracks evidence |
| Best fit | Runtime action governance | Compliance operations at scale |
Who should pick which
Frequently asked questions
Is SentriAI a Hyperproof alternative?
They address different jobs. Hyperproof manages compliance operations - controls, evidence, and frameworks; SentriAI governs live actions and generates runtime evidence. A GRC team could use Hyperproof to organize evidence that SentriAI produces about actual actions.
Does SentriAI manage a compliance program?
No. It does not organize controls and frameworks as a program the way Hyperproof does. It generates runtime evidence from governed actions, which a compliance-operations platform can then track.
How do they complement each other?
SentriAI produces control-mapped, hashed evidence of actions; Hyperproof organizes that and other evidence into a managed compliance program across frameworks.
Which covers AI action governance?
SentriAI. Governing and recording each AI agent action is its core, whereas a compliance-operations platform addresses AI through program management.
Stay in the loop
One practical finance briefing a week - new guides, checklists, and benchmarks.
Govern the action, not just the audit
See a live per-action verdict and trust score on your own AI agents. Talk to us - we will map it to your stack.
Talk to us