Comparison
Fintra Trust vs Kertos
TL;DR verdict
Kertos is focused on privacy and data-protection compliance: automating GDPR and related obligations, records of processing, and data-protection workflows, with strong European grounding. Fintra Trust supports compliance too, but its differentiator is governing AI systems and agents: discovering shadow AI, controlling agent actions, defending against prompt injection, and mapping AI activity to compliance evidence.
What Kertos does well
- Automated privacy and data-protection compliance, strong on GDPR.
- Records of processing and data-protection workflow automation.
- Good European regulatory grounding and localization.
- A focused privacy-compliance product for data-driven teams.
Where Fintra Trust differs
Kertos automates privacy compliance. Fintra Trust adds governance for AI itself, while still supporting continuous compliance and evidence.
- AI governance: shadow AI discovery, AI-BOM, and model/agent oversight.
- AI action governance and prompt-injection defense for autonomous agents.
- Maps AI actions to compliance evidence, connecting AI risk to controls.
- Continuous compliance monitoring alongside the AI-specific controls.
Side-by-side comparison
| Category | Kertos | Fintra Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Core focus | Privacy and data-protection compliance | Continuous compliance + AI governance |
| GDPR / privacy depth | A core strength | Supported, connected to AI risk |
| AI governance | Not the focus | Shadow AI, agents, prompt injection |
| AI-to-evidence mapping | Not a focus | AI actions mapped to compliance evidence |
| Best fit | Privacy-focused teams | Teams governing AI plus compliance |
| Pricing model | Subscription, as published | Contact us: scoped per customer |
Who should choose which
- Choose Kertos if privacy and GDPR automation is your main compliance need.
- Choose Kertos if European data-protection depth is the priority.
- Choose Fintra Trust if you are deploying AI and need to govern agents and shadow AI.
- Choose Fintra Trust if you want AI actions mapped to compliance evidence.
Privacy compliance alongside AI governance
A team may run a privacy platform for GDPR while adding Fintra Trust for the AI layer, especially where AI systems process personal data.
Questions people ask
Is Fintra Trust a Kertos alternative?
They overlap on compliance, but Fintra Trust’s distinct focus is AI governance (shadow AI, agent actions, and prompt-injection defense) while Kertos specializes in privacy and data-protection automation.
Does Fintra Trust handle privacy compliance?
Fintra Trust supports continuous compliance and connects AI activity to your controls, including where AI touches personal data. For deep, dedicated privacy automation, a specialist like Kertos may go further.
Why govern AI where it processes personal data?
AI systems that handle personal data add risk (shadow AI, prompt injection, unmonitored actions) beyond static privacy records. Fintra Trust governs that surface and links it to compliance evidence.
How does pricing compare?
Kertos prices as a privacy-compliance subscription, as published. Fintra Trust is modular: advanced capabilities are license-gated modules you enable as you need them, with pricing scoped on a call.
Keep reading
Guides
Calculators
One finance briefing a week
New guides, checklists and benchmarks, by email. Unsubscribe from any issue.
Privacy compliance meets AI governance
See AI that touches personal data governed and evidenced. Talk to us: we will map it to your stack.